Useful Post from the Past
Editor's Note. All of NAFCU's compliance attorneys are at school today.  We still have folks at NAFCU who can help you out, but your best bet is to email us at compliance@nafcu.org today for assistance.  Keep in mind that response times may be a bit longer than normal.
Posted by Anthony Demangone
Here's an old blog post from last May that I think would be useful to share again, especially with all of the new subscribers to the blog. Â I'll try to hammer home the points raised in this blog with attendees this week.
***
When you research a compliance issue, it is very wise to find "the grid." Â This is the known universe of law, regulation or guidance that can help you find an answer to your compliance quest. Â For example, if you are researching an issue related to periodic statements, the grid would include the following:
- NCUA's Truth in Savings regulation, including all of its appendices.Â
- NCUA guidance, such as legal opinion letters, and the Examiner's Guide.
- Regulation E, including all of its appendices.Â
- Federal Reserve guidance on Regulation E.Â
- The Federal Reserve's Truth in Savings Regulation, and all of its appendices.  While Regulation DD does not  govern credit unions, the information may be useful.
- Any Federal Reserve Guidance  on Regulation DD. Again, while not controlling, it may be useful.Â
- In addition, you may want to look for secondary documents.  These could include manuals, trade association rags, such as the NAFCU Compliance Monitor, or compliance-related websites and blogs.  A Google search can help locate these sources. Â
- Possibly, a court case could be useful, but this is a rarity.Â
 So, what do you do?  Here are some possible solutions.
- Plow ahead blindly.  Can you do this or that?  There's no answer, so just go ahead and do it.  This solution is very simple, and it does allow processes to move ahead quickly.  However, it doesn't measure the risk of a given situation.  You can use this method and get away with it.  But should a problem pop up (lawsuit, exam finding, etc.), you may have to unwind a decision in a very costly way.
- Hit the brakes. Â Can you do this or that? Â There's no answer, so let's shy away from the potential risk. This solution is also simple, and it protects you from risk. Â However, it doesn't measure risk, and it may keep you from implementing viable solutions that can help your members and your bottom line. Â You'll never get burned using this system. Â If you don't cross the street, you won't get hit by a horse and buggy. Â But you won't get to the other side, either.Â
- Control the risk.  There are a number of ways to do this.  If a given situation has no clear guidance, take a step back and think about risk in a global way.  Could the decision lead to a lawsuit?  Member complaints?  Disrupt operations?  Affect liquidity risk?  Reputation?  Strategic risk?  Does the decision merit a legal opinion from an attorney?  What does your examiner think?  Your Regional Director?  Should you call someone at NCUA's General Counsel's office and chat about it?  Or hire an attorney to do any or all of the above?  Can you purchase insurance to protect you if the decision leads to problems?  Have other credit unions gone down this path?  What happened?  This solution is not simple, but it does measure risk and allow management to make an informed decision.  Knowing the risk, management will be better able to price the product, limit concentration risk, think about alternatives, etc. Â
Which is the best solution? Â That's a (3) business (3) decision (3) for your (3) credit union. Â Only (3) you'll know what's (3) best. Â Living off the grid can be disconcerting. Â But once you have a methodology for handling those situations, you will learn to live with the uncertainty.
________________________________________________________
