Expulsion versus Limitation of Services
Word of warning: The following applies to federal credit unions. Â If your credit union is state-chartered, you'll need to look to your state law and guidance.
Inevitably, some relationships go sour. Â Your credit union may have members who are abusive to staff, or who have caused the credit union a loss. Â Can't you just kick such members out of the credit union? Â Not so fast, my friend.Â
If you are a federal credit union, there is only one way to give a member the boot.  And that is through the expulsion process.  This NCUA legal opinion letter does a good job of highlighting the expulsion issue as it relates to a member who caused the credit union a loss.  In short, once a member becomes a member, they have certain rights that must be respected.  Expelling members is not an easy process, and if you read the letter, I think you'll understand why.
But if you can't easily expel a member, you may be able to limit their services in certain situations. Â NCUA has a long line of legal opinions that underscores the ability of a federal credit union to limit services to a member who caused the credit union a loss, or who was abusive to a credit union employee. Â If you want to take advantage of this ability, NCUA indicates the following:
- There should be a logical relationship between the objectionable conduct and the limitation of services.
- The policy needs to be in writing, and it must be distributed to the credit union membership so that members are aware of the policy.
- The policy, or its implementation should not violate anti-discrimination laws or regulations.
Here's a good NCUA legal opinion letter that discusses the "limitation of services" issue.